Legal Opinion

Board of Public Education v. Intille

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1960No. Appeals, Nos. 331, 332 and 352PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Jones,

The three appellants (Angelina Intille, Thomas Deacon and Sadie T. Atkinson) were teachers in the public- schools of Philadelphia- until the Spring of 1954 when they were dismissed by the'Board of Public Education of the School District on a charge of “ineompetency’’, preferred by Dr. Louis P. Hoyer, Superintendent of the Philadelphia public schools. In each case, the dismissal was based solely on the teacher’s refusal to answer certain questions propounded by a Sub-comm it lee (also known as the Velde Committee) of the Un-American Activities Committee of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Adamson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lowenstein v. Newark Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Board of Public Education v. SolerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Wheeler v. Yuma School District No. OneArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Board of Public Education v. AugustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Lowenstein v. Newark Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API