Legal Opinion

In Re Port of Grays Harbor

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 7, 1982No. 5019-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

— The Port of Grays Harbor (Port) appeals from an order denying its petition for an order of public use and necessity that would have allowed the Port to condemn 5 parcels of property along the south bank of the Chehalis River as it flows into Grays Harbor. Since the appeal, the Port has acquired 2 of the parcels, 1 from Skarco, Inc., and the other from respondent Jalo. Of the remaining 3 parcels subject to the appeal, 2 are owned by respondents Sell. One of these is a 4-acre parcel which the Sells have developed for use as mobile home sites and as headquarters for their trucking and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lassila v. City of WenatcheeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. City of Des Moines v. HemenwayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. In Re Petition of Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Marino Property Co. v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. HTK Management, L.L.C. v. Seattle Popular Monorail AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Htk Management v. Seattle Monorail Auth.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Public Utility District No. 2 v. North American Foreign Trade Zone Industries, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Lane v. Port of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API