Legal Opinion
Marino Property Co. v. Port of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1977No. 44213PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.
Plaintiffs Marino Property Co., Roger Benson, and Otto Rasmussen (Marino) brought a claim for injunctive and declaratory relief against defendants Port of Seattle (Port) and the City of Seattle (City). The United States General Services Administration (GSA), which sold Piers 90 and 91 (Piers) to the Port, is not a party. Marino appeals from a summary judgment for defendants. We affirm the trial court.
Summary judgment is available only when "there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." CR 56(c). In reviewing a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Leschi Improvement Council v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Garrison v. Washington State Nursing BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Norway Hill Preservation & Protection Ass'n v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Certification From Federal Court in New York Life Insurance v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ohler v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Lassila v. City of WenatcheeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Asarco Inc. v. Air Quality CoalitionWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Burke & Thomas, Inc. v. International Organization of MastersWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.