Wear Me Apparel Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
DiCarlo, Judge:
Defendant moves to dismiss this action challenging the exclusion of merchandise for lack of jurisdiction. The question presented is whether the Court has jurisdiction over a challenge to the exclusion of merchandise after the importer has removed the merchandise from the customs territory of the United States to a foreign trade zone. The Court holds that it does not have jurisdiction and grants defendant’s motion to dismiss.
*333In December 1980 Customs refused to allow plaintiff to enter merchandise for consumption under plaintiffs visas and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- United States Cane Sugar Refiners' Ass'n v. BlockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Hawaiian Independent Refinery v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- Alberta Gas Chemicals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
- Protests 110236-K of Hooker Electrochemical Co.United States Customs Court · 1946
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pistachio Group of Ass'n of Food Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Allstates Trading & Clothing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Pollak Import-Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990