Legal Opinion

Wear Me Apparel Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 12, 1986No. Court No. 81-4-00448PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion and Order

DiCarlo, Judge:

Defendant moves to dismiss this action challenging the exclusion of merchandise for lack of jurisdiction. The question presented is whether the Court has jurisdiction over a challenge to the exclusion of merchandise after the importer has removed the merchandise from the customs territory of the United States to a foreign trade zone. The Court holds that it does not have jurisdiction and grants defendant’s motion to dismiss.

*333In December 1980 Customs refused to allow plaintiff to enter merchandise for consumption under plaintiffs visas and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  2. United States Cane Sugar Refiners' Ass'n v. BlockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  3. Hawaiian Independent Refinery v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  4. Alberta Gas Chemicals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  5. Protests 110236-K of Hooker Electrochemical Co.United States Customs Court · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pistachio Group of Ass'n of Food Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  2. Allstates Trading & Clothing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  3. Pollak Import-Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API