Legal Opinion

Ergenbright v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 7, 1905No. 14,265PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J.:

This was a suit brought in the district court of Montgomery county for partition, and to recover the rents and profits of certain real estate, the plaintiff claiming to be the owner of an undivided fifteen thirty-seconds interest in the lands described, and alleging that defendants Henderson and Henderson were in possession and wrongfully and unlawfully kept the plaintiff out of possession, and denied to him any right in, or title to, the same.

If appears that the title to the land was held jointly *30by John E. Greer and Margaret M. Greer,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. S. B. Page & Co. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Meyendorf v. FrohnerMontana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Buck v. MilfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Hope Lumber Co. v. Foster & Logan Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1890

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schott v. LinscottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Welsbach Street Lighting Co. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Petersen v. SkidmoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Kenny v. McKenzieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Chisholm v. Creek & Indiana Development Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API