Legal Opinion
Hamm v. Ray
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 30, 2000No. S00A0203Published
1Opinion of the Court
531 S.E.2d 91 (2000)
HAMM
v.
RAY et al.
No. S00A0203.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
May 30, 2000.
Reconsideration Denied July 28, 2000.
George Hamm, pro se.
Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Christopher S. Brasher, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
CARLEY, Justice.
The State Board of Pardons and Paroles (Board) paroled George Hamm, subject to both standard and special conditions. Thereafter, Hamm filed a petition for writ of mandamus to compel the Board to remove certain of the conditions of his parole. The trial court denied the petition, and Hamm appeals.
1. The Board required Hamm to pay an…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Roman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Love v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Fox v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.