State v. Ing

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KOBAYASHI, J.

Appellant was arrested and cited, by the arresting officer, for speeding in violation of Section 15-7.2(2), Revised Ordinances of Honolulu 1969, as amended.

The pertinent testimony of the arresting officer is as follows:

a) That he “clocked” the appellant;

b) That he maintained a constant distance between appellant’s and his car;

c) That there were no vehicles between his vehicle and the appellant’s;

d) That at the high point-of the clocking his speedometer *467read 60 miles an hour but a more constant speed of 50 miles an hour in a 25-mile-per-hour zone;

e) That the…