Haynes v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[T1] A jury convicted Charlee Allen Haynes on two counts of first degree sexual assault. He appeals to this Court claiming that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for sexually assaulting a "physically helpless" victim; the prosecutor committed misconduct by misinforming the jury concerning the effect of its verdict and by using victim impact evidence to inflame the jury's passion; and the district court erred in refusing to address the issue of his mental competency before sentencing. We affirm.
ISSUES
[T2] Mr. Haynes states the issues for our determination as…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Shannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Starusko, JohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Lonquest v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
- Suarez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl BeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Gilbert Ortiz, Jr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Sam v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Travis Bogard v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Dennis Karl Klingbeil v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.