Carpenter v. Mead
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Kay County; Claude Duval, Judge. Replevin by S. J. Carpenter against Paul M. Mead. Judgment for defendant on appeal. From a judgment rendered in the county court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MATHEWS, C.
This was an action in replevin instituted in the justice court for the possession of a certain horse of which plaintiff alleged he was the owner and entitled to the possession thereof. Judgment was for the plaintiff in the justice court, but upon axipeal to the county court judgment was for the defendant and plaintiff now appeals to this court.
It appears from the evidence that tnis controversy had its beginning over a transaction between Joseph Wanko and George Tarpenning involving a horse trade; the said Wanko contending that he was approached by the said Tarpenning…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robb v. DobrinskiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Oklahoma Moline Plow Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Lockwood Bros. v. Frisco Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bales v. BreedloveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Beck v. DaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Tague v. Guaranty State Bank of DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Commercial Credit Co. v. HarjoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Laughlin Motors v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.