Legal Opinion
Oklahoma Moline Plow Co. v. Smith
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 28, 1914No. 3050PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Error from District Court, Blaine County; Jas. R. Tolbert, Judge. Action in replevin by the Oklahoma Moline Plow Company against O. A. Smith. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
Plaintiff’s action was one in replevin, and sought to recover the possession of a large number of wagons and buggies theretofore sold by it to the defendant. The several sales were evidenced by written contracts, each of which includes the following two provisions:
“Second party agrees that the title to and ownership of all goods which may be shipped as herein provided, shall remain in the party of the first part, and their proceeds, in case of sale, shall be the property of the Oklahoma Moline Plow Company, and subject to their order until full payment shall have been made…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Upton v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Stanard v. Sampson Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Brown v. First National Bank of TempleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Clark v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Strong, Deemer & Co. v. DinninySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Patterson v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Carpenter v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Mid-Co Gasoline Co. v. BackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Tague v. Guaranty State Bank of DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.