Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Wieland

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 5, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Carroll District Court. — Host. S. M. Elwood, Judge. Action to recover rent. Trial to the court, and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

1 *5652 *564There is a written lease of the premises in this case, but a revenue stamp was not placed thereon and canceled when it was executed, as required by the Act of Congress of June 13, 1898 (30 Stat. 461). Objection was made to the lease when offered in evidence for this reason. The proper stamp was then placed thereon and canceled by the assignee thereof, whereupon the lease was admitted in evidence. There is nothing in the court’s finding indicating the ground on which judg*565ment for the defendant was based, but we take it to have been based on the failure to stamp tiro instrument when…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Knox v. RossiNevada Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Cassidy v. St. GermainSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1900
  4. Ricord v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  5. Ogden v. ForneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dorr Cattle Co. v. Des Moines National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Beem v. FarrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. State v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Farmers & Traders Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Whittington Park Amusement Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API