Legal Opinion

City of Omaha v. Hugh Murphy Construction Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1926No. 25260PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action, praying that defendants be enjoined from operating and maintaining an asphalt *574plant on the premises described in the petition, on the ground that the plant; as operated, is a nuisance. The trial resulted in a decree permanently enjoining the defendant Hugh Murphy Construction Company, a corporation, its successors and assigns, from operating an asphalt plant upon said premises, and permanently enjoining the defendant Hugh Murphy Company, a corporation, and its successors and assigns, from permitting the use of said premises for the operation of an asphalt…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Faucher v. GrassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  2. Francisco v. FurryNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Lorenzi v. Star Market Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. Western R/C Flyers, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. City of Scottsbluff v. Winters Creek Canal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Stuhr v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Karpisek v. Cather & Sons Construction, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Peden v. Furman UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API