Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. A.J. Bayless Markets, Inc. (In Re A.J. Bayless Markets, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona

Decided November 20, 1989No. Bankruptcy 4-88-1515 PHX RGMPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OP DECISION

LESLIE TCHAIKOVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.

The City of Phoenix, Arizona (the “City”) seeks payment of $20,791.78 (the “Sequestered Funds”) in proceeds from the sale of Debtor’s liquor licenses (the “Liquor Licenses”) in satisfaction of pre-petition sales tax (the “sales tax debt”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds for the City and orders the Debtor to turn over the Sequestered Funds to the City.

SUMMARY OF FACTS

Prior to the commencement of this chapter 11 case on February 29, 1988, the Debt- or operated food markets in Phoenix, Arizona. The Debtor sold…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lubrizol Enterprises, Inc. v. Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc., in Re Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Robert A. Sikes and Janice K. Sikes v. Global Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Nejberger v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (In Re Nejberger)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Shorr v. KindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Bailey v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Bailey v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API