Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Evans
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this environmental litigation, the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment are currently before the Court. For the reasons set forth below, each parties’ motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, various environmental organizations and a concerned individual, seek a permanent injunction against federal offi cials to prevent the United States Navy’s peacetime use of a low frequency sonar system for training, testing and routine operations. 1…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Cook Inletkeeper v. RaimondoDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2021
- Nrdc v. WinterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008