Legal Opinion
Cook Inletkeeper v. Raimondo
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided March 30, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00238Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA COOK INLETKEEPER and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 3:19-cv-00238-SLG GINA RAIMONDO, Secretary of Commerce, et al., Defendants, and HILCORP ALASKA, LLC, et al., Intervenor-Defendants. ORDER RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Before the Court at Docket 53 is Plaintiffs Cook Inletkeeper and Center for Biological Diversity’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs challenge the incidental take regulations (“ITR”) promulgated by the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) that authorize Hilcorp Alaska,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.