Legal Opinion

Buckle v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1994No. 19340PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief under ■ Rule 24.035. Movant sought to vacate a conviction for rape under § 566.030.3, RSMo Supp.1990 (since amended, see RSMo Supp.1993). He was charged with having sexual intercourse with a female to whom he was not married and who was then less than 14 years old. He entered a plea of guilty to the charge and was sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment.

Following an evidentiary hearing on movant’s motion, the trial court made findings of fact, conclusions of law and denied the motion. Movant presents one point…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. TwenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Amrine v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. State v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Tatum v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Gresham v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perry v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Bundy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Porter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Archer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Stavricos v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API