United States v. Joshua Bruce Vicol
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KARL S. FORESTER, Senior District Judge.
This case requires us to determine what action a district court must take to remain within the jurisdictional limitations of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(a), which permits a court to “correct a sentence” no later than seven days after that sentence is orally pronounced. Today we hold that the phrase “correct a sentence” as used in Rule 35 requires a district court to actually resentence a defendant within seven (7) days after the court first orally sentences that defendant. We find that in the present case the district court acted beyond…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MorilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. William J. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Barragan-MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Todd PennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. VicolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
- United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. VicolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008