Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Beneficial Fire and Casualty Company
Utah Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1968No. 11067Published
1Opinion of the Court
442 P.2d 933 (1968)
21 Utah 2d 173
Richard L. ANDERSON, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
BENEFICIAL FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.
No. 11067.
Supreme Court of Utah.
June 20, 1968.
Robert W. Hughes, Salt Lake City, for appellant.
R.M. Child, of Ray, Quinney & Nebeker, Salt Lake City, for respondent.
HENRIOD, Justice:
Appeal from a summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint for recovery under an insurance policy, on the ground that plaintiff had not filed his suit within the time required under the terms of the policy. Affirmed with costs to defendant.
From use of the discovery…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dechter v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Lewis v. HopperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Capehart v. HeadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Anderson v. Beneficial Fire and Casualty CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1968
- Columbia Security Co. v. Aetna Accident & Liability Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.