Legal Opinion
In Re Hurt
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided May 18, 1999No. 19-10286PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
J. MICHAEL DEASY, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
On April 14, 1999, a Chapter 7 petition was filed by Sandra O’Neil as “attorney in fact” for Pauline S. Hurt, the debtor in this case. Ms. O’Neil signed the petition, statement of affairs, schedules, and statement of intention, “Sandra O’Neil attorney in fact for Pauline S. Hurt.” No power of attorney was filed with the petition.
On May 10, 1999, the Court, sua sponte, 1 issued an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to provide evidence that Ms. O’Neil is the debtor’s attorney in fact…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 1993
- In Re GridleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1991
- In Re HarrisonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
- In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re CurtisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2001
- In Re EicholzDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2004
- In Re WashingtonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2003
- In re HurfordUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- In re RiceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.