Legal Opinion

Mente Chevrolet, Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Swoyer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION PER CURIAM:

Petitioner, Mente Chevrolet, Oldsmobile, Inc., seeks review of the trial court’s refusal to amend its'order to include the prescribed language for interlocutory appeals as set forth by 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 702(b). For the following reasons, we quash the petition as untimely.

The petitioner, Mente Chevrolet, brought this action against the respondent, Kenneth Swoyer, alleging violations of the Consumer Protection Law in connection with the transfer of title to an automobile. Specifically, Mente claims Mr. Swoyer certified false mileage and/or refused to disclose correct mileage on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fortune/Forsythe v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. J. J. White, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First Union Mortgage Corp. v. FrempongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Wolloch v. AikenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. McMurrenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. In Re: Estate of Ellesmere FarrellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Lahr, H. v. Lehigh Valley HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API