Legal Opinion

In Re Nelson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1969No. 8533PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Commissioners of the New Mexico State Bar, sitting as referees under the provisions of § 21-2-1(3), N.M.S.A.1953, 1967 Pocket Supp., recommended the suspension of respondent for an indefinite period.

The Commissioners made detailed findings of fact, the majority of which are not controverted. Respondent’s principal objection to the findings seemingly is that the Commissioners did not see fit to accept respondent’s explanation of the facts, and, of course, respondent strongly protests the conclusions drawn from the facts themselves.

We summarize the rather involved factual situation:…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Van Orman v. NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Iriart v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In Re MorrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. GudmundsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Simmons v. Westwood Apartments Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Moody v. StriblingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Young v. Board of PharmacyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. PothierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API