Dayton Hudson Department Store Co. v. Auto-Owners Insurance

OPINION

BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District. Judge.

The parties, a no-fault carrier and an employee benefit plan, dispute their liability for medical benefits required by their mutually insured for injuries sustained in an auto accident. Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company (“Auto-Owners”) moves to dismiss and for summary judgment on plaintiffs claim for reimbursement. For the following reasons, the Court will grant defendant’s motion.

I

While operating an automobile, Steve Boukis was injured in a car accident. Defendant Auto-Owners insured Boukis under a no-fault policy, but refused to pay Boukis’…