Lambert v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
Following a jury trial, defendant Michael Lambert was convicted of criminal deviate conduct and rape, each as a class A felony, resulting in two concurrent 25-year sentences. Defendant's issues may be generally grouped as follows:
1. sufficiency of evidence;
2. failure to exclude victim's hearsay statements;
8. limitation of cross-examination.
1. Evidence Sufficiency
Defendant presents four specific arguments involving sufficiency of evidence. In addressing this issue, we will affirm the conviction if, considering only the probative evidence and reasonable inferences supporting…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Patterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Case v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Penn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Lewis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Spurlock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Stone v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Carr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Lambert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.