Legal Opinion

Lambert v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1989No. 1285 S 520PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

DICKSON, Justice.

Defendant Michael Lambert was convicted of criminal deviate conduct and rape, resulting in two concurrent 25-year sentences. In his direct appeal, this Court affirmed the conviction of criminal deviate conduct and reversed the conviction of rape. Lambert v. State (1987), Ind., 516 N.E.2d 16 (Givan, J. and Pivarnik, J. dissenting to reversal of rape conviction).

Among the issues presented by defendant’s petition for rehearing, we find merit in the contention that his conviction resulted from evidence erroneously admitted under the rule of Patterson v.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Patterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Davis v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Watkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Lowery v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Modesitt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Spurlock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Snellgrove v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Vance v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Carr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API