Legal Opinion

Allen v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 7, 1977No. 1802-2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petrie, C.J.—The

essential issue presented by this workmen’s compensation case is the sufficiency of an instruction defining the term “permanent total disability.” The jury was instructed in the language set forth in WPI 155.07, 1 with the exception that the court inserted between the second and third paragraphs of this standardized instruction,another brief paragraph, as follows:

If, ás a result of an industrial injury, a workman is able to perform only odd jobs, or special work not generally available, then he is totally disabled, unless you find that such a job is available and can be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Kuhnle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Fochtman v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. Swanson v. Westport Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. Buell v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wendt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  2. Graham v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  3. Adams v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Adams v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Theodore Erb v. State Of Washington Department ff Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API