Legal Opinion
CROCKETT v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 28, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00276Unknown
1Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KATHERINE CROCKETT, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., NO. 19-276 AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., _: LTD., VIFOR PHARMACEUTICALS MANAGEMENT, LTD AND VIFOR PHARMA-ASPEREVA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendants. OPINION Plaintiff Katherine Crockett brings negligence, fraud, strict liability, breach of warranty, and breach of consumer protection law claims following purported adverse effects she suffered after receiving injections of Injectafer, a medication prescribed to…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.