Rogers v. Quan
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
This is a companion case to Leng May Ma v. Barber, decided today, ante, p. 185. The five respondents are natives of China who came to the United States seeking admission between 1949 and 1954, four of them arriving before the effective date of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Like petitioner in Leng May Ma, all were paroled into the United States, and all have been ordered excluded. They applied for stays of deportation under § 243 (h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 1 and upon refusal, filed complaints in the District Court seeking judgments declaring their nondeportability to…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Josadac Mariscal-Sandoval v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Siu Fung Luk v. George K. Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service of the United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Edward P. Ahrens, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Miami, Florida v. Rolando Masferrer RojasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- United States Ex Rel. Tom We Shung v. MurffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- United States ex rel Paktorovics v. MurffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.