Legal Opinion
Perros v. County of Nassau
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 24, 2017No. CV 15-5598PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEXLER, District Judge:
Before the Court is the Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs oppose the motion. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
The relevant facts can be summarized as follows: Plaintiffs, Alexander Perros (“Perros”), Thomas Delle (“Delle”), Nicholas Lenoci (“Lenoci”), Victor Patalano (“Patalano”), Ronald Lanier (“Lanier”) and Ibrahim Zahran (“Zahran”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), are all former Corrections Of-*399f…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Goe v. ZuckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Weinstein v. KrumpterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Baptiste v. The City University of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Baumeister v. GarciaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024
- Berkley v. City of New RochelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.