Legal Opinion
Joseph v. Barron
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 10, 2002No. 01-55291; D.C. No. CV-00-09352-CMPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Darrell Lynn Joseph appeals pro se the dismissal with prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, challenging the revocation of his parole. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Reviewing de novo, see McLean v. Crabtree, 173 F.3d 1176, 1180 (9th Cir.1999), we affirm.
Joseph first alleges that the United States Parole Commission (“Commission”) violated his due process rights in finding that he was guilty of conspiring with a government informant to steal aircraft. *390Because Joseph did not exhaust this claim in his appeal to the National Appeals Board, he is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Luchai Ruviwat v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the U.S. And Robert Christensen, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- McLean v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- George I. Benny v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Randy Allen Myers v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Delancy v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997