Legal Opinion

Salem Med. Arts & Dev. Corp. v. Columbiana Cty. Bd. of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1998No. 1997-0993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 80 Ohio St.3d 621.] SALEM MEDICAL ARTS & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. COLUMBIANA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Salem Med. Arts & Dev. Corp. v. Columbiana Cty. Bd. of Revision,

1998-Ohio-657.] Taxation—Real property valuation—Appeal to Board of Tax Appeals—Notice of appeal sent to assistant county prosecutor does not meet R.C. 5717.01’s requirement of filing a notice with the board of revision. (No. 97-993—Submitted October 28, 1997—Decided January 7, 1998.) APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Akron Standard Division of Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Austin Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Salem Medical Arts & Development Corp. v. Columbiana County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nibert v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. 2200 Carnegie, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Foster v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. 4747 Mann, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Musarra v. Cuyahoga Cty. Aud.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API