Legal Opinion

Salem Medical Arts & Development Corp. v. Columbiana County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1998No. 97-993PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 5717.01 provides that when one takes an appeal from a board of revision to the BTA:

“Such appeal shall be taken by the filing of a notice of appeal, either in person or by certified mail, -with the board of tax appeals and with the county board of revision. * * * Upon receipt of such notice of appeal such county board of revision shall by certified mail notify all persons thereof who were parties to the proceeding before such county board of revision, and shall file proof of such notice with the board of tax appeals. The county board of revision shall thereupon certify to the board of tax…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Akron Standard Division of Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Austin Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Groveport Madison Local Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Shinkle v. Ashtabula County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Nibert v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Nibert v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Ross v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API