Legal Opinion
Appistry, Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 19, 2016No. CASE NO. C15-1416RAJPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Richard A. Jones, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Web Services, Inc.’s (collectively “Amazon” or “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss for Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 on the grounds that the two patents asserted by Plaintiff Appistry, Inc.1 (“Appistry” or “Plaintiff’) cover ineligible subject matter. See Dkt. # 36. Having considered the Parties’ arguments, the Court hereby GRANTS Amazon’s Motion.
II. BACKGROUND
This case concerns U.S. Patent Nos. 8,682,959 and 9,049,267 (the “ ’959 Patent” and “ ’267…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- US Patent No 7,679,637 LLC v. Google LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024