Anglim v. Sears-Roebuck Shoe Factories
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
This is an action of contract in two counts alleged to be for the same cause of action. The first is for an alleged breach of a contract in writing reading as follows:
“ Cambridge, Mass., March 23, 1914.
Mr. S. M. Longmire
Sears-Roebuck Shoe Factories
Cambridge, Mass.
Dear Sir:
In compliance with your request and in conformance of our discussion of this morning, at your office, I hereby agree to give License for the use of Spur Track on Purrington St., to your concern, for use for their purposes, for the sum of Seventy-five Hundred Dollars ($7500.00). Such proportion of said sum as is required to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hapgood v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- DeFriest v. BradleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Metropolitan Coal Co. v. Boutell Transportation & Towing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Bryne v. DoreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Gerrish Dredging Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Neilson v. Malcolm Kenneth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Washington & Devonshire Realty Co. v. FreedmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- McHale v. Goshen Ditch Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- New Commonwealth Publishing Co. v. Baybank Middlesex (In Re New Commonwealth Publishing Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.