McDonald v. Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BOND, Chief Justice.
The sole question in this appeal is one of law, whether an order in a divorce suit, directing the father of a minor child to make periodical payments for the benefit of such child is a debt, enforceable by the divorced wife by writ of garnishment. We think the question is definitely settled by our Supreme Court, in Ex parte Davis, 101 Tex. 607, 111 S.W. 394, 17 L.R.A.,N.S., 1140; Cunningham v. Cunningham et al., 120 Tex. 491, 40 S.W.2d 46, 75 A.L.R. 1305; O’Neil v. O’Neil, Tex.Civ.App., 77 S.W.2d 554; Russell v. Russell, Tex.Civ.App., 79 S.W.2d 639; Ex parte Birkhead, 127…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cunningham v. CunninghamTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Ex Parte DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Ex Parte Claude D. BirkheadTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Russell v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- O'Neil v. O'NeilCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
3Cited by11 opinions
- Burger v. BurgerTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Harrison v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Ex Parte HooksTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Menner v. RanfordTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Alford v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.