Legal Opinion

Russell v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 30, 1934No. 13033PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Justice.

• This is an appeal from a judgment for divorce granted to appellee, the plaintiff, and refusing a division of community property prayed for by appellant.

The first assignment of error is that the court erred in not awarding appellant a judgment for alimony. The defendant filed her application for alimony, and same was refused. She then sued in her cross-action on the merits for $1,000, alleging same to be the reasonable amount which should have been awarded her.

Alimony is not a matter of course. Rivera v. White, 94 Tex. 538, 63 S. W. 125. The statute prescribes that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Whiteselle v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  3. Rivera v. White, GuardianTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Hatch v. HatchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Kirberg v. WorrellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Carrasco v. GoatcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Womack v. WomackTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  4. Chase Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  5. Brunell v. BrunellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API