Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Mintzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 15, 1999, which ruled that Sheft & Sheft was liable for unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and those similarly situated.

When last before us, we remitted this matter to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to, inter alia, obtain the testimony of claimant (256 AD2d 965). Following a subsequent hearing at which claimant, an attorney, appeared and testified, the Board adhered to its prior decision finding that the law firm in which claimant was a limited nonequity partner was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WildeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of MintzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re IannielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re Stephen E. Feldman, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FrimanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. In re the Claim of O'SheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. In re the Claim of O'SheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Matter of Shankar (Trillium Trading, LLC)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API