Legal Opinion

State v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 19, 2001No. 00-343PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant Seth Morgan appeals from a district court order that requires defendant to pay the clerk of the court $513.00 within sixty days to repay the state for the services of appointed counsel. He contends that he has no ability to pay this money. We reverse and remand for additional findings.

Before considering the circumstances of this case, we examine the statutory framework for appointment of counsel. The public defender statute creates a three-step procedure for consideration of the applicant’s financial circumstances. In the first step, the court determines whether the applicant is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ex Parte SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. State v. GardnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  4. In re J.B.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. State v. EldredgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. State v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. State Of Iowa Vs. Larry Gene Dudley, Sr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  5. State v. MorganSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API