Dillinger, LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant Electronic Arts, Inc.’s (“EA”), motion for judgment on the pleadings. [Dkt. 89.]
I
Standard op Review
“After the pleadings are closed ... a party may move for judgment on the pleadings.” Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(c). Where, as here, a motion for judgment on the pleadings attacks the sufficiency of the complaint, the motion “is subject to the same standard as a motion for dismissal for failure to state a claim [under Rule 12(b)(6) ].” Thomason v. Nachtrieb, 888 F.2d 1202, 1204 (7th Cir.1989). Under that standard, “a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lesea, Inc. v. Lesea Broad. Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019
- Akeem Daniels, Cameron Stingily, and Nicholas Stoner v. FanDuel, Inc. and DraftKings, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2018
- Hart v. Electronic Arts, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Fry v. Ancestry.com Operations Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- Pratt Logistics, LLC v. United Transport IncDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.