Legal Opinion
Hill v. Xerox Bus. Servs., LLC
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 20, 2018No. 94860-7PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCLOUD, J.
*752¶ 1 In Washington, hourly workers are entitled to their contractual hourly rate of pay (or the legal minimum wage) for every hour worked. Piece rate workers, on the other hand, are entitled to their contractual piece rate (or the legal minimum wage), but that rate is not necessarily guaranteed for every hour individually worked: a higher production hour might subsidize a lower production hour. See WASH. DEP'T OF LABOR & INDUS., EMP'T STDS. ADMIN. POLICY (DLI Admin. Policy) ES.A.3 (July 15, 2014). That means that the characterization of a compensation formula as either hourly or piece rate can…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 46 v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Seattle Professional Engineering Employees Ass'n v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Gary Dean Broad Denise Broad, Husband and Wife v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau AgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Tiffany Hill v. Xerox Business Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Martinez-Cuevas v. DeRuyter Bros. Dairy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2020
- Port Of Tacoma, V. Joel Sacks, Dept. Of L & ICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- CONSTANTINO v. SHAWS SUPERMARKETS INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
- Empey v. Caliber Holdings LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.