Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Miller v. Sovereign

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

■Error to the district court for York county. Tried below before Norval, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

The defendant is county clerk of York county, and this action was brought by the relator, who is a resident and taxpayer of that county, to compel the defendant to include in his report of fees those received for abstracts of title. The court below found the issues in favor of the defendant and dismissed the action.

Sec. 78 of Chap. 18, Comp. Stat., provides that “ the county clerk shall be ex officio register of deeds, and shall have the custody of, and safely keep and preserve all books, records, maps, and papers kept or deposited in his office; he shall also record, or cause to be recorded…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Ferguson v. ShropshireNebraska Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brooks v. State ex rel. SingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State ex rel. Frontier County v. KellyNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. HolmNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Morse v. County of HitchcockNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  5. State ex rel. Board of Supervisors v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API