United States v. Benish
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUMBAULD, District Judge.
Defendants, following a non-jury trial, were convicted of the charges contained in Count 2 of the Indictment (but acquitted under Count 1, relating to transactions on a different date). Count 2 charged violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) on or about August 1, 1973, in that defendants distributed 9,886 capsules of “Phendimetrazine, a Schedule III controlled substance.” Motions in arrest of judgment, or for new trial, are pending.
The so-called “Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970” established five classes of “controlled substances.”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Ray RoyaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Irving Davis, M. D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. William S. Polan, George H. Wehner, Sr., William S. PolanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. VerdiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. James P. WisniewskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.