Legal Opinion

Barratt v. Burlingham

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 23, 1985No. 82-359-AppealPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHEA, Justice.

This is a civil action brought by Mark F. Barratt (Barratt) and his parents, William J. and Bernadette Barratt, against Peter Magnant, a North Kingstown special police officer; Michael J. Burke, a North Kingstown police officer; and the town of North Kingstown.1 The case comes before us on the plaintiffs’ appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs contend that the judge below erred in granting that motion. We affirm.

Initially, we note…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Steinberg v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  3. Becker v. BeaudoinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  4. Ryan v. State, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  5. Calhoun v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Leake v. CainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Ezell v. CockrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Banks v. Bowen's Landing Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  5. Hydro-Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API