Legal Opinion

Williams v. Smith.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 23, 1904PublishedCited by 9 opinions

ActioN by J. H. Williams against I. H." Smith, heard by Judge Fred. Moore, at November Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of Chaven County.

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

The plaintiff alleged that the defendant wrote and published in the New Bern Daily, a newspaper published in the city of New Bern, of and concerning’ him a certain article entitled “An Honorable Man.” That said article was a malicious libel, etc. The article was signed “Smith,” and refers to the defendant as “one Williams.” The defendant demurred to the complaint, and among other grounds for demurrer says: “That the plaintiff should allege that before bringing this suit he gave the defendant five days’ notice in writing, specifying the article, and the statement therein which he alleges to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reining v. . City of Buffalo, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Johnson v. . FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Nichols v. Nichols.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  4. Love v. Commissioners of Chatham CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  5. Hopkins v. Hopkins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Leach.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Comer v. Age Herald Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Meyerle v. Pioneer Publishing Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Efird v. . Comrs. of ForsythSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Comer v. LouisvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API