Legal Opinion

Tozer v. O'Gorman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 4, 1896No. Nos. 9754-(97)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Washington county, Williston, J., dissolving an injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

START, O. J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, Tozer, on behalf of himself and others similarly interested as stockholders of the corporation of Seymour, Sabin & 'Co., against O’Gorman as receiver of such corporation, and against O’Gorman personally, and other defendants. The gist of the cause of action alleged in the complaint is that O’Gorman, as receiver, was directed by the court to sell the property of the corporation of Seymour, Sabin & Co., and he did sell the same to the defendant Searles for $55,000, who directed the property *2to be transferred and delivered to the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Gorman v. SabinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Tozer v. O'GormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Cosgrave v. McAvayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API