Tozer v. O'Gorman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action by plaintiff, as a stockholder of Seymour, Sabin & Co., and in behalf of the other stockholders of that corporation and all persons interested therein, against J. C. O’Gorman individually, and as receiver of said company, J. N. Searles, the Minnesota Commercial Company, and the Stillwater Union Depot & Transfer Company. J. C. O’Gorman individually, and as' receiver, and J. N. Searles answered.
Read the full summary
Action by plaintiff, as a stockholder of Seymour, Sabin & Co., and in behalf of the other stockholders of that corporation and all persons interested therein, against J. C. O’Gorman individually, and as receiver of said company, J. N. Searles, the Minnesota Commercial Company, and the Stillwater Union Depot & Transfer Company. J. C. O’Gorman individually, and as' receiver, and J. N. Searles answered. The plaintiff demurred to the tenth and eleventh subdivisions of their answer. In the eleventh subdivision the defendants alleged nonpayment of the bond mentioned in the opinion; that the…
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the court below overruling plaintiff’s demurrer to a part of the answer of the receiver and the defendant Searles. On May 12,1884, the property of the defendant corporation Seymour, Sabin & Co. was duly sequestered under G. S. 1878 c. 76 § 9 (G. S. 1894, § 5897), and the defendant J. C. O’Gorman was appointed receiver thereof, who duly qualified and entered upon the discharge of his duties. A large amount of claims, aggregating about one million of dollars, was presented to the receiver against the Seymour, Sabin & Co. corporation, which corporation was…
2Cited by2 opinions
- O'Gorman v. SabinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Tozer v. O'GormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896