Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 10, 1982No. 2 CA-CR 2385, 2 CA-CR 2420PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

The main issue in this case is whether the police violated A.R.S. § 13-3916 and the United States constitutional prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures in their execution of a search warrant. The trial court held that they did not and refused to suppress the evidence.

Appellants, husband and wife, were charged with the unlawful possession of marijuana for sale. The trial of Leticia Wright was severed from that of her husband. After the denial of the motion to suppress, William Wright was found guilty by a jury for the lesser-included offense of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DeMichelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. People v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. State v. RisherArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. BatesArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Mazepink v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. State v. McInellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. State v. PapineauCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. State v. FallonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API