Legal Opinion
Laurel Hill Cemetery Ass'n v. All Persons
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 1945No. Civ. No. 12748PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued to quiet title to real property, naming as defendants “all persons” in accordance with the act “to provide for the establishing and quieting of title to real property in case of the loss or destruction of public *192records,” Deering’s General Laws, Act No. 1026. Three persons claiming an adverse interest in the property appeared and set up their claims. Judgment went for the plaintiff quieting its title and decreeing that the defendants had no interest in the property. The three defendants have joined in an appeal from the judgment.
The plaintiff bases its claim of title upon a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hopkins v. GrimshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Grisar v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Faxon v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- San Francisco City and County v. Le RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Stuart v. EastonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Laurel Hill Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947