Legal Opinion

Covad Communications Co. v. BellSouth Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 20, 2002No. 01-16064PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.* BY THE COURT:

The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of Rehearing En Banc, in which ANDERSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, join:

I. Background

A…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James Kehoe v. Fidelity Federal Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Covad Communications Company v. Bellsouth CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API