Covad Communications Co. v. BellSouth Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.* BY THE COURT:
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of Rehearing En Banc, in which ANDERSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, join:
I. Background
A…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- James Kehoe v. Fidelity Federal Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Covad Communications Company v. Bellsouth CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002