League of Women Voters of Mich. v. Johnson
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partQuist, District Judge
I agree with the majority opinion that Plaintiffs have satisfied standing at this stage of litigation on a district-by-district basis and that, in the same vein, the League of Women Voters of Michigan has derivative standing to challenge the districts in which its members reside. But I disagree with the majority opinion's rationale in the discussion section I.B.2. Specifically, in my view, no Plaintiff-not the League or any individually named Plaintiff-has properly supported standing for a statewide claim.
As the majority opinion explains, the individual Plaintiffs have brought forth…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Crawford v. Marion County Election BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Lance v. CoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gill v. WhitfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.