Legal Opinion

Elam v. Allbee

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 1968No. 32997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Commissioner.

The sole issue here is whether the plaintiff pedestrian made a submissible humanitarian case against the defendant motorists by showing his and their relative positions and courses of movement before the impact. We find he did not.

Plaintiff got a $12,000 verdict and judgment but the trial court granted defendants’ after-trial motion for judgment in accordance with their previous motion for directed verdict. (Alternatively, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for a new trial on the ground the evidence failed to support plaintiff’s humanitarian submission. Civil…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Banks v. Morris CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Wright v. OsbornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Yarrington v. LiningerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Duke v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1973
  2. Jones Ex Rel. Auberry v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Carter v. Consolidated Cabs, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  4. State v. TalbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Finch v. KegevicMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API