Elam v. Allbee
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
The sole issue here is whether the plaintiff pedestrian made a submissible humanitarian case against the defendant motorists by showing his and their relative positions and courses of movement before the impact. We find he did not.
Plaintiff got a $12,000 verdict and judgment but the trial court granted defendants’ after-trial motion for judgment in accordance with their previous motion for directed verdict. (Alternatively, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for a new trial on the ground the evidence failed to support plaintiff’s humanitarian submission. Civil…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Banks v. Morris CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Wright v. OsbornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Yarrington v. LiningerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Duke v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1973
- Jones Ex Rel. Auberry v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Carter v. Consolidated Cabs, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- State v. TalbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Finch v. KegevicMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.